logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.18 2016가단129483
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 7, 2017 to October 18, 2017.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff completed the marriage report with C on July 6, 1995 and had one male and female between them.

From around 2014, the Defendant came to know C from around 2014, and sent and received text messages via C and telephone, which includes the contents of the Plaintiff’s sexual criticism, and used double-parents and horses, etc., which are in a relationship with people, and received text messages at any time until late every day.

C On November 5, 2016, the Defendant, along with a bicycle, went to a single spawn mountain located in Daegu, and died at around 15:06 on the same day, even though he was transferred to the D hospital located in Daegu, he received street trees due to the breakdown of the bicycle brakes on the road for the middle-spawn road in which he was returning to Korea, and died on the same day.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, described in Gap evidence 1 through 6, video (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers), the purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the above recognition facts, the defendant committed an unlawful act with C, who is the plaintiff's spouse, and infringed the marital life of the plaintiff and thereby inflicted mental suffering on the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay the above mental suffering to the plaintiff monetaryly.

With respect to the amount of consolation money, 10,000,000 won out of 50,000 won claimed by the Plaintiff shall be recognized as consolation money, in consideration of all the circumstances shown in the records and arguments in the instant case, such as the health care unit, the marriage period, marital life, the school situation, period, and form of the Defendant and C, etc.

Therefore, the defendant is about the existence and scope of the defendant's obligation from February 7, 2017, which was the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff as a result of the illegal act against the plaintiff 10,000,000 won.

arrow