1. The Defendant’s KRW 38,447,690 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 16, 2013 to December 24, 2014.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Urban planning facility project (eight routes, such as 2-19 lines, etc., as orchard) (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Public notice of Suwon City on March 8, 2012 - Project operator No. 2012-56: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on March 22, 2013 - The land subject to expropriation: The land subject to expropriation is located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Plaintiff: (a) 756.1 square meters of parking lot B 756.1 square meters of parking lot B (C parking lot 1242.9 square meters and divided on June 29, 2012; hereinafter “instant land”); (b) the starting date of expropriation: May 15, 2013 - Compensation: (c) 1,110,975,530 square meters: (d) Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) the Plaintiff filed a claim for expropriation of the remaining land other than the land No. 1 in this case; (c) 1242.9 square meters of parking lot, which is owned by the Plaintiff; (d) the Central Land Tribunal rejected the claim on the ground that the remaining land area of this case is larger than the previous land area and its shape is considerably difficult to use.

- An appraisal corporation: Telecommunications appraisal corporations and central appraisal corporations (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser”) and the results of the appraisal shall be referred to as “adjudication appraisal”);

C. The court's entrustment of appraisal to appraiser D - Compensation for losses (the land No. 1 in this case): 1,149,423,220 - Conditional appraisal of the remaining land (the land No. 2 in this case): In case where the claim for purchase of the remaining land is recognized, compensation for losses for the land No. 2 in this case shall be 740,03,360 won (the ground for recognition) and no dispute exists; Gap No. 1, 3, 4, and Eul No. 1 (including the serial number); the result of the court's entrustment of market price appraisal of appraiser D (the "court appraiser D"; the result of the appraisal is referred to as "court appraisal") and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 regarding the instant expropriation ruling on the increase in land compensation No. 1 of this case.