1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant A, from the beginning of 2008 to the end of 2009, engaged in the sales business of high-speed cranes D in the name of “E” in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and operated an automobile magazine “G” under Article 409 of the F Building 409 in Goyang-gu, Seoyang-si. Defendant B was a person who worked with Defendant A from the beginning of 2008 to the beginning of 2008.

At the office of the victim H located in Gwangju Mine-gu around June 2008, the Defendants, together, had the right to dispose of the scrap metal of Jinsan located in the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea as wages claims against the victim.

The decision of the Korean Supreme Court of the Philippines that the above union has the right to dispose of all the abandoned mine facilities has already been made in 2007, and there is no legal problem.

E, which is delegated by the mining labor union, set up an MOA for investment, at the intervals of 5 million down down down a down payment of 1.5 million won among them, E, which is operated by the president of L, who is delegated with authority by the mining labor union, and paid for 1.5 million won (Korean Won 30 million won).

Since the right of priority has been secured for the abandoned mine scrap business, it is necessary to pay the remainder down payment of 3.5 million won (Korean Won KRW 90 million) in order to proceed with this contract.

In the future, M will not make an investment of KRW 2 billion, and if M makes an investment of KRW 90,000,000, it will be able to compensate for the amount of KRW 10,000,000 and pay its profits.

On July 9, 2008, the victim paid KRW 90 million as the down payment for all closed mine facilities to L, who is a scopter, at a mutual influent hotel located outside the Philippines, in the name of the scopter.

After all, the Defendants contacted the victim on July 2008 and sent 30 million won in order to continue to conduct the business as if they did not fully repay the amount of KRW 30 million,00,000 to NN, a local bromoer of the Philippines, at the time of preparing the MOA with the intent to make an earlier investment, and if they did not fully repay the amount of KRW 30 million to N.

different. The phrase “....”

(b).