1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On September 15, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) believed that the Defendants would be able to arrange a cargo transport business by concluding an entrustment contract with a logistics company that can work on the 26th day of each month when they are employees of the logistics transport company and purchase a truck from them; and (b) concluded a sales contract with the Defendant B on September 15, 2017, signed and sealed the automobile management right transfer contract signed and sealed by the transferor’s agent as the transferee and signed and sealed by the transferee; and (c) subsequently, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendants on the cargo in the attached list with the terms and conditions that the Defendants actually transported the cargo while transporting the cargo, compared to the terms and conditions that the Defendants promised, the truck sales contract entered into between the Defendants and the Defendants would be disadvantageous to the Plaintiff. As such, the truck sales contract concluded with the Defendants was concluded by deception of the Defendants, or by the Plaintiff caused an error in its important part, and sought the return of the goods already paid due to the return of the goods and the redemption of the purchase price.

The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone was erroneous in the declaration of intent as asserted by the Plaintiff.

In addition, there is no other evidence to prove the Defendants’ deception, or there is no other evidence to prove it.

2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.