logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.12.11 2014고단2018
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On July 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was accompanied by the Defendant’s wife, who was under the influence of alcohol, to return home to the Defendant’s wife at the Goyang-gu C apartment 901 Dong 114, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyangyang-gu, Goyangyang-gu; (b) on July 30, 2014, the Defendant confirmed the Defendant’s residence, etc.; (c) and (d) on July 30, 201, after being accompanied by the Defendant’s wife, who was under the influence of alcohol to return home to the Defendant’s wife, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of patrol duties, including assaulting the F’s face and pushing him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Application of the police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

4. The act of using violence against police officers performing their duties to ensure the safety of citizens and maintain social order on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is an element of sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, it is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognizes the facts charged in this case and reflects the facts charged in this case, the fact that the defendant is deemed to have committed an accident by drinking, and is making it difficult to

Furthermore, the sentencing data expressed in the arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and criminal records, are taken into consideration equally, and the sentencing guidelines for obstruction of performance of official duties formulated by the Sentencing Committee also

arrow