The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspended sentence of two years, the fine of three million won, the probation, the community service for 120 hours, the confiscated sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant has no particular criminal history, considering the fact that the defendant not only established and operated a speculative gaming machine in his office, but also stuffed several times, the liability for the crime is not easy, taking account of equity with criminal punishment for other crimes similar to the crime of this case, as well as other criminal punishment conditions of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions of this case, such as circumstances after the crime of this case, the above sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.