logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단1652
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, on April 5, 2012, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.065% without a car driver’s license on April 5, 2012, Defendant A driven a golf car with a halogen car from Dongdaemun-gu Seoul E Hospital to the front road of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1), was accompanied by the chief of the car driving without a driver’s license, when Defendant B, a doctor of E Hospital working for Defendant B, was driven without a driver’s license.

Defendant

B, at the above date, as the Seoul Central Tran Police Station guards and police officers belonging to the Seoul Central Tran-gu Seoul Central Government Police Station walked to the drinking control by the traffic safety department, at the front of the F, A was cut to a chief string, and the Defendant B changed the string to a driving seat, and around April 7, 2012, the Seoul Central Tran Police Station guard and the traffic safety investigation team knew that A was driving the said car to a slopeH by making a false statement about the fact that he committed the crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, but A was a criminal, even though he was aware of the fact that he was committing the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. Statement to the Prosecutor's Office;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. An explanatory note for each control;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Determination as to the Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion of the investigation report (the circumstantial report of the host driver)

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel argued that the police officer I stated that the driver was replaced even if the driver was unable to confirm the inside of the vehicle at the location, it is false to say that the driver was replaced even if the driver was unable to confirm the inside of the vehicle at the vehicle at issue. The police officer I stated that the driver was replaced with the vehicle inside the vehicle at issue.

arrow