1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by imprisonment for four months; and

2.Provided, That this judgment shall become final and conclusive, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, who was aware of that he was in Pyeongtaek-gu, Daegu North Korea on April 2015, 2015.

At the G's office, G operating an adult entertainment room by exchanging customers with "B has some police officers who know well, and as the subordinate employees of B request to B to do so, so that they are able to carry out funeral services without regulating four things.

It stated to the effect that “one million won per month is changed at the expense.”

The Defendant received three million won from G during the period of May 2015 from the foregoing office to the lower police officer on August 2015, 2015, as a solicitation fund for the police officer in charge of the duty of regulating entertainment rooms, the sum of KRW 12 million during four times a month during the period between the Defendant and the lower police officer on August 2015.

As a result, the defendant received 12 million won under the pretext of solicitation for the case handled by a public official.

2. Defendant B is a police officer belonging to the H police station.

On October 8, 2015, the Defendant was in the Republic of Korea from Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, 17:30 on October 8, 2015, and was aware of it.

A At the request of the Defendant’s subordinate staff member, the Defendant instructed K to inquire of the details of the receipt and delivery of the J by telephone, and let the said K inquire of the details of the receipt and delivery of the said J by the National Police Agency PDA at around 17:37 of the same day, and then confirm the fact that K was assigned by the J from K, and notify the said A of the fact that the J was assigned to him.

Accordingly, the defendant revealed official secrets by law as a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of each prosecutor's office concerning G;

1. A investigation report (the analysis of telephone conversations between A, G, B, etc. on October 8, 2015);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the J of the details of inquiry into water supply;

1. Article 11 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph A of the decision of punishment: Attorneys Park 111.