The judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 33,658,562 and its amount from January 6, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On January 6, 2015, C: (a) around 22:45 on January 6, 2015, C is the Defendant’s vehicle at the intersection at the entrance and exit of the head office in Seopopo-si (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

) Even though the stop signal is still stopped in the direction of the entrance of the middle door from the direction of the E High School, the part on the right side of the Plaintiff’s driving, which was driven from the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle at the time to the right side (on the direction of recovery from the front side of the two-way intersection), was shocked by the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as double stroke, brain-dead, dystrophism, dystrophism, stroke damage to the left-hand side of the trauma, damage to stroke, damage to the stroke, damage to the left-hand side of the 7th radius, and the left-hand stroke, etc.

On January 6, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in G Hospital on February 24, 2015, and discharged on May 6, 2015, the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on February 24, 2015, after receiving 5-6 on the left-hand side of the Republic of Korea, 6-7 on July 24, 2015.

3) The Defendant is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, and Nos. 1 and 2 (including the serial number, hereinafter the same

3. Descriptions 7 of the evidence, the result of the physical appraisal commission to the head of Jeju University Hospital of the first instance court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the evidence duly admitted prior to the limitation of liability, the Plaintiff entered the intersection without stopping the vehicle signal from the front side even though it was yellow signal, and thereby, can be recognized the fact that the instant accident occurred. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s negligence or liability is deemed as the cause of the instant accident and the expansion of damage.

Therefore, these circumstances are examined.