The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, around 23:45 on January 201, 201, was not on the top of the household distance in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the right line of which was located in the right line in front of the furniture, and was in the right line to the right line, from the right line to the right line, and in conflict with the Dsch Rexton vehicle, who was in the right line to the right line in the right line to the right line from the air room of the Suwon Central Hospital, and was parked by the shocking of the Esch Rexton vehicle, at the time of shocking the Esch Rexton vehicle, at the same time.

Nevertheless, at around 16:10 on January 31, 201, the Defendant submitted an injury diagnosis statement to the victim Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., a insurance company that purchased Lone Star Co., Ltd. at the time of the accident, stating that he was injured as at the time of the accident as at the time of the accident.

The defendant tried to receive insurance money from the victim under the pretext of medical expenses and agreement, but he was discovered and attempted.

2. The F’s legal statement, the police’s statement, G’s legal statement and its statement, and H’s legal statement are admissible as evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case.

However, each evidence duly adopted and examined by the court and the following circumstances indicated in the records of this case, ① the accident of this case conflicts between the Lone Star Vehicles and the Poston Vehicles after the collision, and as at the time, the collision between the Lone Star Vehicles and the Poston Vehicles was the principal accident, and thus, the negligence between the above two vehicles seems to have been the principal concern. ② After the accident of this case, F was discussed as the negligence of G and the accident, the driver of the Poston Vehicles, and F was not aware of the fact that the employee of Samsung Fire Co., Ltd, the insurance company of the Poston, was dispatched to the site of the accident of this case. ③ At the time of the accident of this case, I, the employee of Samsung Fire Co., Ltd, the insurance company of the Poston Vehicles, who was the insurance company of the Poston Vehicles, was the employee of the Samsung Fire Co., Ltd at the time of the accident of this case