1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant completed the marriage report on October 16, 2008, and lived together with two children born in 2009 and 2011, and completed the divorce report on October 28, 2013.

B. According to the written agreement on the bringing-up of the child and the decision of the person with parental authority prepared by the plaintiff and the defendant at the time of the divorce, both the person with parental authority and the person with parental authority for bringing-up of the two children have been designated as the plaintiff. The expenses for bringing-up shall be paid periodically to the plaintiff by the defendant 300,000 won per month, but the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff

C. Whether the Defendant did not pay child support, etc. properly, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for change of the person with parental authority and the person with parental authority over the Plaintiff around 2017, on the ground that “It is difficult to readily conclude that the change of the person with parental authority and the person with parental authority to the Defendant accords with

(Reasons for recognition): Each entry in Gap evidence (including the serial number) and the purport of the whole pleadings, as well as the purport of the whole pleadings, on June 25, 2018.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant did not have paid the child support once after the divorce and did not have any contact with his children. Rather, the Plaintiff unilaterally applied for the change of the person with parental authority and the person with custody, and neglected the children in the visitation right, which was conducted by the prior disposition, while unilaterally applied for the change of the person with parental authority and the person with custody, and the child still did not pay the child support or interview the visitation right, and eventually, the child is suffering from serious emotional confusion. As his father claims compensation for mental suffering.

However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to support such argument. In particular, the reason why the defendant applied for the change of person with parental authority and person with custody is the intention to receive money from the defendant as a child support.