1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a major partner of the DVR DV Redide Rec.

Digital video storage and transmission equipment are translated into digital video storage and transmission equipment.

Although it is similar to CCTV (Closed-circuit TV) generally known in terms of function, there is a difference from the operating method in that it stores images distributed by a camera in a separate computer or hardware, different from CCTV recorded in a video tape;

A company that engages in monitoring, manufacturing, and sales business (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff company") and Defendant B is a person who has overall control over the affairs of managing customers, contracting parties, etc. until he/she retires from his/her office on April 2007, and Defendant C is an employee on November 14, 201.

On January 18, 2012, the retired person, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is a company that engages in the manufacture, sale, etc. of electronic and electrical products.

나. 발주처의 요구에 따라 제품을 생산, 납품하는 중국의 Shenzhen boyean future technology 주식회사(이하 ‘베이온’이라 한다)와 거래 관계에 있던 원고 회사는, 2011. 3.경부터 베이온에 발주를 주어 DVR 케이스를 생산하고 이를 개인사업체인 F을 통하여 주식회사 하니웰코리아(이하 ‘하니웰’이라 한다)에 납품하기로 하는 사업(이하 ‘이 사건 사업’이라 한다)을 추진하고 있었다.

C. However, on January 31, 2012, Defendant B agreed to retire due to the dispute with G, which is the actual manager of the Plaintiff Company, and sent to F the Plaintiff Company an official document stating “F, in the name of the Plaintiff Company, that “The 4U case No. 50 orders issued from Egys are clearly known to Egys that production is infinite, and that production is infinite at the time of business reference” (hereinafter “instant official document”).

On the other hand, the defendant C entered the defendant company on January 25, 2012, one week after the withdrawal of the plaintiff company, and the defendant company entered the defendant company on February 2012 through VR, which is a trader of the plaintiff company, around February 2012.