1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 1, 2013 to December 13, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. In full view of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, Eul witness testimony and the whole purport of argument, the plaintiff, the representative director of Eul, around 2004, introduced Eul, a company that was an employee of the defendant, who was a representative director, and operated the business related to mobile phone keyboard, as a company that was a representative director, and Eul collected money from the above company and invested a total of one billion won in the above company. However, around 2005, the defendant lent the company funds created through investors, such as C, to Eul, etc., a trading company F without obtaining approval of investors or resolution of the board of directors, but the above company also lent the funds to the defendant around July 2006, E et al., the investors of Eul et al. demanded the return of the investment funds to the defendant, and the plaintiff, who introduced the defendant to Eul, paid the funds to the defendant up to 1 billion won after 100 billion won and 200 billion won.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the above KRW 1 billion to the plaintiff according to the agreement of this case, except in extenuating circumstances.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. As to this, at the time when the defendant returned to D, the defendant tried to make up for the reason that the plaintiff caused the defendant's business errors in the management of the defendant's corporation Eul, the defendant continued to pressure and insult the defendant, and forced the plaintiff to make up for the reason that the plaintiff would not make a written statement as the plaintiff did not make a written statement, and forced the plaintiff to make the agreement of this case by the plaintiff's coercion.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this.