logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.04 2015가단166943
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) 5% per annum from July 22, 2015 to October 15, 2015; and (b) October 16, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On February 21, 2013, the Defendant driven B Round 6 B Round (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 08:35, and driven the four-lane road in front of the entrance crossing of the parking lot of an independent park of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane distance from the location of the inventory.

(2) The Defendant, even though a straight-line signal, entered a bus-only one lane, which is a bus-only one-lane and proceeded along the lane, received the rear part of the right side of the D-Obba (hereinafter “Plaintiff-only”) of the Defendant’s vehicle, into the front part of the front part.

At this point, it was possible to be a internship only when the pedestrian signal is made and safety marking was installed on the center line.

(3) E on board the back seat of the Defendant vehicle suffered injury, such as a string to the right string and a sloping to the right string, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to the traffic accident.

B. (1) The Plaintiff is the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s vehicle is subscribed only to liability insurance, and according to the non-insurance coverage agreement, the Plaintiff paid KRW 171,770,160 to E until July 21, 2015 and written down KRW 22,247,960 as medical expenses.

Afterwards, it received 60,000,000 won as liability insurance money from Dong Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.

(2) Around the time of a traffic accident, E was gaining monthly average 4,784,889 won, and due to a traffic accident, E was suffering from permanent disability of 12% high level and vertebrate 32%.

The plaintiff judged that the negligence of C driving the plaintiff vehicle is 20%, and calculated the lost profit, consolation money, etc. and paid insurance money to E.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judgment of the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by E, the victim, as a tort, because the defendant committed a traffic accident while making a U-turn in violation of the signal.

The plaintiff shall pay insurance money to E in accordance with the non-insurance coverage agreement.

arrow