logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.15 2016노827
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (one million won in penalty) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The act of transferring an access medium to electronic financial transactions requires strict punishment in addition to undermining the safety and reliability of financial transactions, as well as the means of other crimes, and the access medium provided by the Defendant has been abused for phishing crimes. However, even though it is recognized that the Defendant has committed the instant crime, it is against the fact that the Defendant approved the instant crime, the Defendant voluntarily surrenders to the investigative agency, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, including the following: (a) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment; (b) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance after the crime

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow