logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.10 2017고정371
업무상실화
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who is engaged in the man-made business, was requested by C to do an up-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-to-face-face-to-face-face-to-face-face-

On June 23, 2016, from around 09:00 to 15:25 on the same day, the Defendant dinyl chlorides into the floor of the living room (706) and dinyl chlorides by mixing the starting width on the vinyl, and then dinating them into a lease by inserting them into a hack, and then dining them into a door door, and then dining them into a door door. After then, the Defendant din the hacks into a house, and then removed the hacks remaining in the hacks by spraying the hacks.

In such cases, the manager has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence and expansion of fire by taking fire safety measures, such as ventilation, and installing fire extinguishers near the workplace, etc., as it is difficult for the manager to easily fluorize the oil, and vinyls attached to the floor which are easily made of static electricity, and thus, the risk of fire is dangerous.

Nevertheless, the defendant opened only the window on the front side of the bend, opened the opposite door door without closing, and opened the fire extinguisher to the front side on the ground of interference with traffic, and opened the fire extinguisher to the front side on the ground of interference with traffic. The defendant's negligence in cleaning of air lease using este dilution and cropers without preparing a fire extinguisher in the living room which is the working place. On the same day, at around 15:25 of the same day, the bit generated by the static electricity that occurred due to the static electricity that was caused by the flaping of the flap, vinyl, etc., and moved to the whole inside 706 inside the 706 inside the flap and D apartment 102 outer wall of the flap, etc.

The defendant is responsible for the repair cost of KRW 71,720,00 due to the above occupational negligence (which is equivalent to the inside repair cost of KRW 706) and the entire amount of KRW 706.

arrow