logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.09 2017고단8559
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 8559,” a person who supplied eggs to the “C Mart” located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, and began to supply eggs to the said Mart.

From around 2014, the victim D was aware of the traditional liquor supplied to the same marina.

On January 2, 2016, the Defendant made an investment in shares E in the victim within the aforesaid “C E”.

Since the return on profit is good at the beginning of the year, there is no principal loss.

Since the F Securities has worked for not less than 10 years, it has been 75 times high profit in small amount of investment.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant did not have any kind of her work in F securities for more than 10 years. The Defendant supplied eggs at the time and thought to use them in the cost of living with money from the damaged party due to insufficient monthly income to raise about 1.8 million won, and there was no intention or ability to pay high-profit profits by investing in E’s shares.

On January 7, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 2,00,000,00 from the injured party as investment money from G bank account under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 32,30,000 in total on 24 occasions as shown in the annexed crime list 1, May 7, 2016, including the transfer of KRW 2,30,00 from the injured party to the G bank account under the name of the Defendant.

The Defendant, on February 2016, 2016, introduced the Victim H who operates a mooring distribution company from a patrolman, and around that time, the Defendant decided to operate the business and operated the business for the victims who fall short of the operating know-how and distribution network.

A. On March 3, 2016, the defrauded concluded that the “J” operated by the injured party I at Osan-si (“J”) was false to read that “The Defendant would pay the victim money to the new customer.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant received money from the injured party and thought to use the money in the existing debt repayment, the defendant's living expenses, etc., and received money from the injured party, they do not work for the new customer.

arrow