1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants deliver the “Yansan-si District Member D, 1977 square meters” prior to D, and

B. Defendant B shall be attached to the ground.

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff is the owner of the land indicated in the disposition, and the Defendants are recognized to own the ground as above. Therefore, if the Defendants fail to pay the land right to oppose the Plaintiff, they should deliver the land according to the Plaintiff’s claim for exclusion of interference based on the Plaintiff’s land ownership and remove the ground materials.

피고 C은, 토지에 대해서는 원고가 소유권을 취득하기 전에 소유자인 E이 피고 B에게 임대하고 다시 피고 C은 피고 B으로부터 전차받았고, 피고 C이 소유하고 있는 지상물(㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣)은 피고 B으로부터 소유권을 이전받은 것으로서 행정상 불법 건축물이 아닌데다가 매매대금과 유익비 등으로 71,000,000원 가량을 지출하였으므로, 이 금액을 원고로부터 보상받아야 한다는 취지로 주장한다.

This assertion is without merit, since the defendant's assertion does not contain any assertion about the right to use the land that can be asserted against the plaintiff even if all of the defendant's assertion is true.

Claims against the Defendants are reasonable within the scope of the above recognition.