beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court are dismissed, respectively.
2. After an appeal is filed.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is a doctor to operate the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul High Court “Csung Foreign Medical Institute” (hereinafter “Defendant’s Council member”).
B. The Plaintiff was administered as follows by a medical specialist in sexual surgery who is employed by the Defendant.
1) On October 13, 2016, the Plaintiff explained that: (a) around 2013, a person without medical license had been in injection on the part of the bank; (b) there were a large quantity of foreign substances, such as industrial bags, within the oil protection organization; and (c) the Plaintiff expressed to D the intent to wish to undergo the Bab World Cup after the surgery after receiving consultation on the Babing alcohol from the Defendant Assembly member; (d) however, (e) the Plaintiff was given a written consent on the operation on the Babs.
3) On October 26, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) as a result of the DNA surgery conducted by Defendant Council members on October 26, 2016, it is deemed that the instant surgery was conducted pursuant to the Oral Rule of Procedure (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
D) At the time, the organization was removed from the right side of the river, 383.4g, and 303.5g from the left side of the river at the time, and a large quantity of industrial liquid container was discharged from the organization within the river. After the instant operation, the Plaintiff’s excursion ship room was more than the Plaintiff’s World Cup, and the Plaintiff’s excursion ship room was more than the Plaintiff’s excursion ship/ferry, and there was non- ex post facto reflective reflects on the upper part of the horizontal direction of the river basin (No. 3-1, 2), the Plaintiff filed a complaint on the ground that the Defendant Council members had a large amount of shocks, and that the Plaintiff filed a complaint on the ground of an operation part of the river basin. D. On December 29, 2017, the Plaintiff received an exorbitative surgery again from the Em-type and Embian National Assembly members with the Ombalpt method, and at the present time, the Plaintiff’s excursion ship room is more than the Plaintiff’s predecessor’s 3-2, 15-1,5-13 (3) evidence No.
hereinafter the same shall apply.
entry, Gap evidence, Eul evidence, Eul.