logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고합441
살인미수
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2016. 11. 경 이웃 주민인 피해자 D( 여, 59세) 의 애완견에게 정강이를 물려 다쳤는데도 피해자가 발뺌하여 괘씸하다는 이유로 피해자에 대한 반감을 품고 피해자를 살해할 마음을 먹었다.

around 17:00 on April 19, 2017, the Defendant laid the door before the victim's house 110 dong 1515, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E Apartment 110 dong 1515, and then sprinked the victim with two arms in order to kill the victim by destroying the victim's house out of the hallway rail outside of the above house, and then pushed the victim with a rail without rhhing the victim's surface, and then sphing the victim's body part into a rail with a height of 123 cm. However, the victim was deprived of the victim's body part at the top of the rail of 123 cm.

The Defendant continued to see “human life,” and put a steel spawn in its corridor, and laid the victim’s upper body part of the victim’s body in the same way once again, followed the victim by the same way, but the victim spawnds the victim again into the front part of the rail, and the victim spawned the victim at the time when she tried to spawn the victim at the time when she was spawn, and she escaped from the neighbor’s F.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to kill the victim from the 15th floor of the above apartment, but he attempted to do so.

2. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the witness D, F, and G’s respective statutory statements, alone, was proved to the extent that it is beyond reasonable doubt that the Defendant, with the intent of murdering the victim, was taken by the body of the victim to take part at the end of the railing of the above apartment corridor;

It is difficult to see it.

3. Not guilty of the jury's verdict (nine jurors): Eight persons. One person.

4. Conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered after the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the Criminal Act is applied.

arrow