1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below is revoked, and this is applicable.

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of KRW 60,026,918 for the goods related to the goods of the items display, ② KRW 16,80,00 for the goods related to the points undisclosed, ③ 7,516,49, and KRW 360 for the relevant goods, ④ 8,120,360 for the telephone fee, etc. related to the case, ④ 12,89,082 for the employees, ⑤ 12,89,082 for the employees, health premiums, KRW 9,334,920, labor income tax, KRW 1,078,170 for the wage and salary income tax, and ④ 43,847,200 for the automobile lease contract, and KRW 159,623,145 for the reimbursement of damages for delay.

The plaintiff won the claim in the part of the claim in the above paragraph (1) and damages for delay equivalent to 36 million won and the part of the claim in the above paragraph (4) and the part of the conjunctive claim in relation to 806,940 won and the damages for delay equivalent to 36 million won and 8,006,940 won in the part of the claim in the above paragraph (1). The plaintiff did not appeal against the whole of the conjunctive claim in the above paragraph (1) and (4) above, (2), (3), (5), and (6).

Therefore, the part of the plaintiff's main claim and the conjunctive claim are excluded from the plaintiff's main claim, and the part against the plaintiff among the claims as set forth in paragraph (1), (4), (2), (3), (5), and (6) from the judgment of the court.

2. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole arguments and arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 16, 20, 21, and 24 (if any, including the serial numbers), and as a whole, the facts as to the case.

With respect to the operation of dental hospitals in Seongbuk-gu Seoul 2nd floor C201 (hereinafter “instant building”) on June 9, 2009, the Defendant is liable for all expenses, benefits, and taxes of dental hospitals. The Plaintiff is the director of the dental hospital.