A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

19,729,710 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and additional collection KRW 110 million at the Busan District Court on September 21, 2017, and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant is the representative director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) established for the purpose of real estate auction business, etc. in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and D is the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) established for the purpose of real estate development business, etc. in the same office as the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), and the actual operator of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) established for the purpose of real estate development business in the same office.

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle legal affairs, such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, reconciliation, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, etc. with respect to litigation cases, unaccompanied cases, criminal investigations and other general legal cases, in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits.

D With respect to “The land and buildings thereon (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) located outside J, G, and nine parcels of land and buildings thereon (hereinafter “the instant real estate”), which are the site scheduled for the implementation of the I Regional Housing Association, were awarded a successful bid for the instant real estate in the real estate auction procedure commenced on October 18, 2012, and acquired the ownership of the said real estate on March 30, 2015. However, in the said auction procedure, it was difficult for K, L, and M, etc. (hereinafter “the instant lien holders, etc.”) to exercise their normal rights, such as receiving a substitute loan for the repayment of the proceeds of sale, because they continue to possess part of the instant real estate.

Accordingly, the defendant was carried out as a "professional in solving the right of retention", and was introduced D through FF Staff N on April 2015, 2015, and "D" only solves the problem of the right of retention of the real estate of this case, and land and buildings.