1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are added to the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following 2., and the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff filed an administrative appeal seeking the revocation of the above rejection disposition, and the plaintiff partly accepted the plaintiff's claim from the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, and the defendant disclosed information to the plaintiff in accordance with the purport of the above ruling.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. On March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Central Administrative Appeals Commission filed an administrative appeal with the Plaintiff on March 27, 2014 against the revocation of the disposition rejecting disclosure of the instant information and the instant information (hereinafter “instant rejection disposition”). The Central Administrative Appeals Commission, among the instant rejection disposition on September 23, 2014, filed a judgment revoking the part rejecting disclosure of the instant information with respect to ① the names of transportation companies from among the instant information, vehicle numbers, and ② the corporate number of each transportation company from among the instant information, the number of business entities from among the instant information, the number of business entities, the number of employees who hold office, the number of vehicles for each transportation company, the number of employees who hold office, the number of vehicles for new employment/retirement, and the date of new employment/retirement, was unlawful, while the Defendant rejected disclosure of the instant information under the binding force of the Plaintiff, the Defendant did not disclose the information to the Plaintiff due to mental suffering.