1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From among the amount of KRW 8,841,601 to be actually distributed on November 23, 2015, the distribution schedule was prepared in the Ulsan District Court B, which included the distribution of KRW 346,792 to the Plaintiff and the Defendant 6,67,854 to the Defendant.

B. The Defendant, based on the No. 334 of the notarial deed No. 334 of 2015, issued by a notary public against C (debtor) with respect to the claim for benefits to C (debtor) against the Republic of Korea on the basis of the notarial deed No. 334 of the notarial deed of 2015, the U.S. District Court issued a seizure and collection order of the claim under the Act on July 3, 2015, and

C. The Plaintiff’s attorney appeared on the date of distribution, and raised an objection against KRW 5,742,189 out of the Defendant’s above dividend amount, and filed a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution on November 27, 2015, which was seven days thereafter.

[Reasons for Recognition] The significant facts in this Court, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the notary public against the defendant C (debtor) who served as the ground for the defendant's dividend amount is a false claim on the No. 334 of the notarial deed No. 2015, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion on the ground of the evidence No. 1 or No. 3, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.