logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.09.11 2015노466
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding or misunderstanding of legal principles) is that the driver’s seat where the defendant was the defendant was unable to confirm the contact point between the victim and the vehicle, the victim was at the time of leaving the victim, and the victim did not speak to the purport that the treatment is necessary, and the defendant was old and his passenger also stated to the effect that the victim was dead even with the vehicle, and that the defendant did not escape or destroy the accident after the accident. In light of the fact that the defendant did not know the fact of injury and did not intend to commit an escape.

In addition, in light of the fact that the victim did not receive any other treatment than physical therapy, did not receive any other treatment, and stated that there was no intention to do so to the hospital at the time of the accident, the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered any injury under the Criminal Act

2. Determination

A. The lower court did not have any criminal intent by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence presented by the lower court.

The defendant's appeal to the effect that there was no injury or injury is dismissed and guilty of the crime.

(1) While the Defendant asserts that the part of the victim’s left elbow is a minor accident that has contacted the right side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle and the part of the victim’s left elbow is a minor accident, it can be recognized that the part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle in front of the right part of the victim’s driving vehicle was shock

Defendant

운전 차량이 골목길에서 서행 중이었더라도, 진행 중인 차량과 사람이 충격한 사고이고 위 충격으로 피해자가 오른쪽으로 튕겨졌다가 땅에 손을 짚고 일어났으며 세 걸음 정도 뒤에서 위 사고를 목격한 목격자가 충격 당시 피해자의 몸이 붕 떴다고 인식할 정도였으므로, 그 충격이 미미하였다고 보이지 않는다.

(2) The Defendant is aware of shocking facts, and a chief window is opened to the victim, and the victim is “unclaimed”, and the Defendant was driving a vehicle as it is, and left the site.

arrow