logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.12.15 2017고단1613
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant thought that he will be used to commit self-defense, and thus, has taken a view that he stolen clothes of women.

1. On May 20, 2017, at around 14:00 on May 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in the victim D’s residence located in Gunposi C; (b) went to the victim’s residence, thereby impairing the victim’s house; and (c) went to the victim’s house, which was immediately dried on the rooftop, with one panty panty, in which the market price of the victim’s house was unknown, was stored and stolen.

2. On July 4, 2017, at around 12:42, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim’s residence, the residence of the victim F, the Sinpo City E, via the above gate door, which was opened with the victim’s intent to steals his clothes, into the victim’s residence; (b) intrudes the victim’s residence; and (c) placed one panty panty in the victim’s house, the victim’s market price, which was the victim’s soon dried on the third floor of the third floor, could not be known, and stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement in F and D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes recording the scene of occurrence and escape of suspect image pictures, access to the place of crime, and suspect image pictures of the escape suspect;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (influence of residence) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (influence of residence), the selection of fines, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is not less than that of a crime in light of the background, content, and frequency of the crime, various sentencing conditions such as the defendant’s age, sex, occupation, etc. should be taken into consideration.

arrow