beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.
Seized evidence Nos. 12 through 22 shall be confiscated from Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B, on November 25, 2010, he/she was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and completed the execution of his/her sentence on March 31, 201; Defendant A, on November 5, 2009, sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and on November 13, 2009, the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 25, 2010, and was sentenced to eight months of suspension of execution to eight months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s net support and revoked the said suspension of execution on November 13, 201.
"2015 Highest 1278"
1. Except as otherwise provided for in any other Act, no defendant A may transfer or acquire any means of access which is used in electronic financial transactions nor set a pledge thereon;
Nevertheless, around January 4, 2013, the Defendant connected the Internet site to the PC room located in the Newbuk-dong, Gwangju, and posted a letter to the effect that “the passbook is sold.” This paper will give 500,000 won if the Defendant sent the passbook to the Defendant.
“In contact with the Defendant, the Defendant opened a post office passbook (Account: D) account in the name of the Defendant at the request of the above person without the name of the victim, and transferred the passbook and cash card to the person with no name. 2. On July 9, 2012, the Defendants conspired to receive money from the Internet hosting site for the purpose of raising the living expenses by accessing the Internet hosting site and receiving money under the name of the other male and female, such as rent. According to the above plan, Defendant A, along with Defendant B, exchanged with the victim E on July 9, 2012, for the purpose of having access to the Internet hosting site “Sol” club in the mutual influence in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju, with the victim E, and the fact that the Defendant was communicating with the victim E, even if he did not receive money under the name of the next person, was “I are being able to see” even if he did not have any intention to reduce.