The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is divided into the crime, and the circumstances where the defendant committed the crime for the purpose of supporting his family in China by punishing living expenses in Korea are recognized.

However, the crime of this case is an act impeding the management of foreigners in Korea and disturbing the judicial order, and it seems inevitable to sentence sentence in light of the method of crime and the period of illegal stay of the defendant, etc. It appears that the court below has determined the punishment by fully considering various circumstances as stated in the judgment of the court below. In light of the fact that there is no change of circumstances that the court below and the punishment are different from the judgment of the court below, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for the argument of this case and the sentencing on the records of this case, including the defendant's age, character and character, environment, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the defendant'

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, Article 229 (Exercise of the same Act) of Part 5 of the lower judgment is clear that it is a clerical error and ex officio deletes it pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure]