logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2016.09.21 2016가단335
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Defendant D, Defendant C, E, F, and G with respect to 3/13 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. As to the Defendants’ primary claim, the Plaintiffs asserted that on July 20, 2015, one of the deceased H’s co-inheritors purchased real estate indicated in the separate sheet of unregistered state (hereinafter “instant real estate”) which is the inherited property from Defendant D, one of the co-inheritors, and sought implementation of each of the procedures for the transfer of shares against the Defendants, as stated in the primary claim.

However, even according to the plaintiffs' assertion itself, since the other party to a sales contract for the real estate of this case is defendant D, it cannot be claimed against the other defendants except the above defendant for the implementation of the procedure for the transfer registration of shares for the real estate of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion on different premise is without merit.

2. Determination as to the Defendants’ conjunctive claim

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Defendant B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. The remaining Defendants except Defendant B: The judgment of deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow