1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid operator who has entered into an automobile mutual aid contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On December 13, 2014, C: (a) driven by the Defendant on the part of December 13, 2014, traveling along the roads in front of the U.S. S. S. S. S. S. U. S. S. S. S. B along the two-lanes of the front of the U.S. U.S. S. S. S. B attempted to make a right-hand way; and (b) there was

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff paid 98,670 won, total of 147,850 won, and total of 147,850 won, for each of the medical expenses for Plaintiff vehicle drivers D and E who participated in the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion that the accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of the Defendant's vehicle moving ahead of the right and changing the course of the vehicle. The Defendant entered the intersection at the point where the accident occurred, and since the Plaintiff's vehicle was parked in the three-lane, the Defendant's vehicle was making a right-way at the two-lane. Since the Plaintiff's vehicle stopped but attempted a right-way without considering the degree of progress of the Defendant vehicle, the Plaintiff's vehicle and the Defendant's driver's fault ratio in relation to the accident in this case is 70:30.

3. In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff's vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue, the plaintiff's vehicle was parked in the three-lane stop, and the defendant's vehicle was making a bypass during the two-lane stop, and the penter part after the right side of the defendant's vehicle at the time of the accident at the time