Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the defendants are above two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, as married couple, have put in a set the necessary things in a set, and had them look at with the cryp of Defendant B, which was prepared in advance to be buried in the cryp of the body of people, with the above things put in the house of Defendant B.

From October 20, 2013 to November 17, 2013, the Defendants: (a) at the victim D store located in Sinpo City, Inc., Ltd., Ltd.; (b) cut off 12 game factorings equivalent to the market price of KRW 265,000, the total market price of KRW 504,000; and (c) cut off 18,000 in the above manner; and (d) theft from the above date to November 19, 2013, the Defendants stolen goods equivalent to KRW 1,076,990 in total seven times in the above manner, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, from the above date to November 17, 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly stolen the property owned by the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants, each police protocol against E

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic photographs, receipts, thefts, etc., -CCTV photographing photographs (as common to the defendants);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do148, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation);