beta
Text
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants (two years of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment, and one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of this case is a common sentencing factor for the Defendants. The crime of this case is committed by the crime of the booming booming method, in collusion with many people and people to booms against those who booms at an expressway resting area, by cutting down a boom and taking advantage of profits by selling it. The crime of this case is committed systematically and repeatedly by using a special manual or tool in accordance with a brupt plan, such as sharing the roles of each group of people in collusion. In particular, 4 out of the total 5 cases of the crime of this case, among 5 cases of this case, 5 or more people habitually stolen another's property, and its statutory punishment is aggravated than special larceny under the Criminal Act, and even though there had been the history of punishment already been punished under the same law, the Defendants committed the crime of this case habitually, it is a very unfavorable factor that is common to the Defendants.
Defendant
B In regard to the crime of this case, consideration is given to the fact that the above defendant took part in the crime of this case by serving as the so-called "componing the victim's vision", that the defendant committed the crime of this case several times, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution due to robbery and bodily injury.
There is a lawsuit.
Defendant
As to E, the above defendant took part in the crime of this case by serving as the so-called "technical expert" or "s winding," and the same criminal records as to five times, considering that the above defendant did not have any past record of punishment after around 194.
There is a lawsuit.
On the other hand, the defendants led to the confession of all of the crimes of this case, and there was an agreement with the victims as the principal offender who committed the crime of this case.