beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts on June 3, 2017: around 14:54, at the five story E E E E E E E E E (Trademark: F; hereinafter “instant drying machine”) of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building, there was a smoke from a fire, etc.
(hereinafter “instant fire”). The instant drying machine was manufactured in a foreign country and imported it into the Republic of Korea by a third party, who is not the Defendant, and the Defendant supplied the instant drying machine to E around 201.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-8 (including virtual number), witness G's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Assertion and determination
A. The grounds for the Plaintiff’s claim are as shown in the annexed sheet.
B. According to the appraisal result of the National Science Investigation Agency of the instant drying machine (Evidence A) by the National Science Investigation and Research Institute (Evidence 3), it appears that the electricity power plant, which was connected with the power plant, continuously generated by the contact point of the power source line with the power source line, has been dried out of the surrounding combustible material due to electrical heat generated by the electrical heat generated by the contact point of the power source line with the power source line, and the electrical heat generated by the incomplete contact with the power source line, etc. However, considering that the power source line, installed on the surface of the instant drying machine, was not burned and the power source line was not burned, and the used body of the dur business, which was connected with the power source, was not melted, and as soon as possible, did not seem to have any unique feature, such as the divers and connecting cables inside the functional control unit, and considering the possibility that the Defendant violated the duty of due care to the occurrence or exclusion of the instant building itself (the testimony number No. 1 to the witness of this case).
between the act of the defendant and the fire of this case.