logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.12.13 2012고단635
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From November 2004 to November 2005, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When intending to engage in credit business, if intending to lend money due to high business feasibility, 7% interest shall be given per annum, and he shall be repaid immediately with the money borrowed before he/she has given a loan. It may be repaid before he/she has given a continuous loan of money.”

However, at the time, the Defendant had no particular property with bad credit standing, and the Defendant had not been able to pay interest worth KRW 214 million borrowed from the victim, and the Defendant had not been able to pay the principal of KRW 214 million due to the lack of experience in credit business, and there was no intention or ability to pay the principal even if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim and receiving on November 2, 2004 from the victim’s wife, KRW 30 million from the victim to the Gyeongnam Bank account in the name of the Defendant’s wife, and received on March 11, 2005, KRW 50 million, KRW 35 million on April 22, 2005, KRW 65 million on April 27, 2005, KRW 35 million on May 17, 2005, KRW 35 million on May 17, 2005, KRW 35 million on May 18, 2005, KRW 5 million on July 10, 2005, KRW 1.5 million on July 10, 2005, KRW 5 million on the loan, KRW 1.5 million on the loan, KRW 1.5 million on August 10, 205, KRW 2005, KRW 1.5 million on the loan.

2. On July 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant may repay money borrowed prior to the continuous lending of money to the victim D(the age of 51) (the age of 51) in the vicinity of the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”).” to the effect that “The Defendant may repay money borrowed prior to the issuance of money.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was in the state of reporting the enemy while engaging in credit business, and the previous victim was unable to pay interest for the principal amounting to KRW 659 million.

arrow