1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates a grouping stores of “C” and a grouping stores of “D” with food manufacturing and wholesale and retail businesses.

The defendant entered into a franchise contract with the plaintiff and operated a subdivision store in the name of "C original store" around June 2013.

나. 1) 원고는 2013. 6. 18.경부터 2014. 9. 9.경까지, 필요한 식자재 원재료를 구입하여 튀김과 떡볶이 등의 식료품을 조리할 수 있는 상태로 만들고 여기에 양념과 소스 등의 배합까지 마친 상태로 포장하여 이를 피고에게 공급하였다. 2) 원고는 위와 같이 식료품을 공급하면서 거래명세서를 작성하여 피고에게 교부하였는데, 거래명세서에는 투입된 원재료 및 부재료의 내역과 가격을 기초로 한 원재료 투입금액과 물류 및 인건비 등이 기재되어 있고, 위 원재료 투입금액과 물류 및 인건비 등의 합계액이 청구금액으로 기재되어 있었다.

C. The defendant did not pay KRW 29,586,505 out of the amount claimed by the plaintiff for supplying food as above to the defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) did not agree with the defendant that he would supply food at the cost of raw materials, and the plaintiff supplied food at the price that the defendant consulted with the defendant. In addition, the plaintiff agreed to pay a certain portion of the distribution cost and personnel expenses to the defendant. However, if the number of member stores increases later, the defendant agreed to reduce the amount that the defendant bears. 2) At the time of concluding a franchise contract with the defendant, the plaintiff agreed to supply food materials, etc. to the defendant for cost, but in fact, it is the average price of the goods sold at the village market.