logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.01 2017노2215
변호사법위반
Text

All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (a year of imprisonment, an additional collection of 17,2650,000 won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized all of his/her crimes; (b) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; and (c) the fact that there is no special problem among the accepted cases.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, such as the fact that an unqualified person was unable to intervene in another person's legal case, thereby protecting the interests of interested persons, protecting the fairness of legal life, and promoting the smooth operation of the law and order, thereby disrupting the sound trade order in the legal market, and thus, it is necessary to strictize it. The defendant's period of committing the crime of this case is about 6 years, and the amount of the fee gained by the crime of this case is very large.

As above, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment in consideration of various favorable and unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant, and there is no special change in the depth of the case.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view the sentencing of the court below is too heavy or unreasonable since it is difficult to view the sentencing of the court below as unfair. Therefore, each of the above arguments by the defendant

3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in entirety in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow