logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고합248
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one and half years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for larceny from May 29, 2009, when he/she was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for his/her punishment for larceny in a capital district court located in Suwon-do on May 29, 2009. On August 14, 2009, the Incheon District Court sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny. On May 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for larceny from the capital district court located in Suwon-do, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for larceny. On January 12, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment of KRW 6 months for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court of Seoul, and on May 13, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny, etc. on April 26, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 26, 2017, the Defendant related to the Victim C was employed in disguised E convenience points operated by the Victim C at L in Singju City on June 26, 2017.

On June 27, 2017, the Defendant stolen the property amounting to KRW 80,000,000,000,000 in cash, which is the victim's possession, using the gap of the victim's leaving and being mixed at the above convenience store around 02:0 on June 27, 2017.

2. With respect to victims F;

A. On July 5, 2017, the Defendant was employed in disguisedly on the H convenience store operated by the Victim F in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

On July 6, 2017, at the above convenience store around 01:14, the Defendant stolen KRW 1,000,000 in cash account account, using the gaps without the victim. As such, the Defendant habitually stolen another’s property.

B. The Defendant was connected to the convenience store calculation program managed by the injured party at the same time, time, and place as the above A, and then entered the “cash charging of transportation cards” and “amounting to 90,000 won”, and then substitute one copy of the transportation card charging device possessed by the Defendant.

arrow