beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) Of the real estate 14 floors listed in the separate sheet, each point is indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.
Reasons
1. There is no dispute between the parties regarding the facts as stated in the separate sheet as “Supplement of Claim Causes”.
따라서 피고는 원고에게 임대료 등 연체로 임대차계약이 해지됨에 따라, ① 별지 목록 기재 부동산 14층 중 별지 도면 표시 1, 2, 3, 4, 1의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 131㎡를 인도하고, ② 39,719,480원 및 2018. 5. 15.부터 위 ①항 기재 부동산의 인도완료일까지 월 임대료 및 관리비 4,356,110원(= 임대료 2,593,800원 관리비 1,762,310원)의 비율로 계산한 연체 임대료 및 관리비 내지 그 상당 부당이득을 지급할 의무가 있다.
2. As to this, the Defendant, by January 30, 2018, agreed to enter into a lease agreement at the same time upon the payment of KRW 20 million out of the overdue rent, etc., and accordingly, the Defendant paid KRW 20 million on January 25, 2018.
The Plaintiff, as alleged by the Defendant, had an agreement between the Defendant and the Plaintiff to renew the lease agreement, on the sole basis of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.
It is not sufficient to recognize that the re-contract has been made, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
The defendant's argument is without merit.
3. If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.