logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.05.10 2015구합435
채용계약기간만료 및 재연장불가결정재차 알림처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 1, 2006, the Plaintiff was newly employed as a member of the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province C division (D) for a two-year contract period. On November 1, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant for the same two-year contract period. On November 1, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant for the same one-year contract period. On November 1, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant for the same one-year contract period and was in charge of the same duties until October 31, 2011. (2) On February 25, 2011, the Plaintiff had Do Council members undergo deliberation on the F Evaluation and arrange for the Plaintiff through F Evaluation and received money and valuables from LPG construction business operators, etc. from the “be subject to a fine for negligence of 10 million won and 10 million won” due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment”).

3) Meanwhile, around August 2011, the Defendant explicitly stated that the term of the contract may be extended by up to five years (up to a total of five years depending on business performance).

(4) On November 1, 201, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant and entered into an employment contract with the Defendant on November 1, 201, and served as C members as C members. 4) On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant with the following contents, and was in charge of the same duties as C members.

[However, as the former Local Public Officials Act was partially amended to include the integration of existing public officials in contractual service, who are classified as public officials in non-career service, into public officials in general service, etc. (Act No. 11531), the Plaintiff's class was changed from the local contract officer (a) to the local facility officer (a general term of office) as the former Local Public Officials Act enters into force on December 12, 2013). The contract period under Article 3 (Contract Period) of the Employment Contract for Local Public Officials is the contract period.

arrow