logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단5343
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B imprisonment of 8 months, and Defendant C of 7 million won, respectively.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and two years of suspended sentence for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on March 9, 2017, and the said judgment was finalized on March 17, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants, at around 01:00 on January 15, 2017, 201, d apartment of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 107 Dong 906, Meetptoptotop (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) mar, a local mental medicine, put about about 1g of Meptoptop (one philopon”; hereinafter “philopon”), and dyphum dump dump, so they dump.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones even though they are not the narcotics handler.

2. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and C;

A. The Defendants, who committed the crime on January 15, 2017, kept approximately one gram of opon from the Defendant C’s residence on January 15, 2017, around 23:00, around January 15, 2017, and dump dump dump dump dump dump.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones even though they are not the narcotics handler.

B. The Defendants, who committed the crime on February 13, 2017, kept approximately one gram of opon from the Defendant C’s residence on February 13, 2017, around 21:00, around 13, 2017, and dump dump dump dump was dumped.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to administer philophones even though they are not the narcotics handler.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A letter of narcotics appraisal (the reproduction of narcotics);

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report criminal investigation (the confirmation date of the judgment becomes final and conclusive);

1. Defendants who choose the pertinent legal provisions and punishment for criminal facts: Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1)1 and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendant C who handles concurrent crimes: After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1);

1. A and C of the aggravated concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow