logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고정657
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 13, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime on July 13, 2013, committed with the victim on July 23:40, 2013, and led to the victim’s grandchildren, etc. on the ground that the victim reported gambling in the room of the defendant’s residence located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Seoul, reported gambling.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. On July 27, 2013, at around 21:40 on July 27, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime, at the same place as the above paragraph (1) and at the same time, the victim knife the back part of the victim by hand, knife bucks, knife the knife, and knife the knife with the knife. with the knife.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim.

3. On November 7, 2013, the Defendant, at around 07:0 on November 7, 2013, 2013, carried out a locked victim at the same place as the above Paragraph 1, and carried out a bath to the victim, stating that “The Defendant was able to bring the victim a locked, who was frightd in the same place as the above Paragraph 1, and was able to take down the victim’s will.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Results of fact-finding surveys on the key hospital and the National Health Insurance Corporation;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's act does not constitute self-defense in light of the content and content of the instant case, and the degree of tangible force inflicted on the victim, even though there was a physical fighting with the victim and his/her defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Thus, the defendant's assertion against the defendant and defense counsel cannot be accepted.

arrow