The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected in the crime is favorable.

However, the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and the crime of this case also committed during the period of repeated crime. The crime of this case is disadvantageous to the Defendant, such as intrusion on the structure managed by the victims at night, theft, etc.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the offense, means and method of the offense, and circumstances after the offense, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.