1. Defendant B’s KRW 170,040,00 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 29, 2014 to December 2, 2015, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff related to the party (the former trade name was “dimera” but the former trade name was changed to the current trade name on March 27, 2015; hereinafter “Plaintiff” regardless of whether before or after the change was made) is a company that purchased the shares of Defendant C (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) with the introduction of the Defendant A, and the Defendant A entered into an advisory contract with the Plaintiff and the Nonparty Company. The Defendant B is the representative director of the Nonparty Company, the Defendant C is the inside director of the Nonparty Company, and the Defendant C is the Defendant B’s wife and the inside director of the Nonparty Company.

B. On January 25, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a share purchase agreement with Defendant A to advise the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff’s new business strategy planning, external international R business affairs, attraction of investments, and securing of funds. On April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a share purchase agreement with Defendant C to purchase KRW 334,000,000 (hereinafter “instant share acquisition agreement”), and on the same day, paid the acquisition price of KRW 240,00,00 (hereinafter “the acquisition price of this case”).

C. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s criminal complaint against the Defendants was found to have been different from that of Defendant A after concluding the instant contract, and the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants on the charge of deceiving the acquisition price of the instant case. (2) As a result of the investigation, Defendant A and C filed a complaint against the Defendants. Defendant B provided a business plan to Defendant A, an investment broker, with the sales and operating profits of the Nonparty Company, and provided the Defendant A with a business plan to cover the sales and operating profits of the Nonparty Company, and had the Defendant explain the contents of the said business plan to the Plaintiff’s officers and employees, thereby deceiving the Plaintiff.”