The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, such as the absence of the same criminal record and the amount of damage, and that the defendant's wife did not completely recover from damage, and that the defendant's wife was at the time of the defendant's death, and that the defendant's wife was in need of hospital expenses, and in light of the criminal behavior of using the defendant with gambling funds, etc., the crime is not good, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment imposed on the defendant is appropriate, and the sentencing judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.