Text
Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is the borrower who requested the vicarious driving, and the defendant B is the vicarious driving engineer.
1) At around 00:45 on May 15, 2020, Defendant A committed assault, such as: (a) the fact that the Defendant was at a location other than a destination in the street near the Singuro-ro 92 “B” in Gwangju-si; (b) during dispute, he was fluoring Defendant B’s chest by hand; and (c) fluoring Defendant B in drinking 3-4 times at the same time and place as “preh”; and (d) Defendant B committed assault, such as: (a) the price of the chest and the lower body part of the Defendant A’s breast and the lower body part at two-3 times as drinking and drinking, and then cutting the neck with arms.
2. Determination: Judgment dismissing each of the victims on November 18, 2020 after the prosecution of this case under Article 260(3) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;