logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.10 2015가단222806
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 91,959,00 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 6% per annum from March 26, 2016 to May 10, 2017.

Reasons

(b)the following:

The name of a construction project: The date of commencement of the aggregate wage portion among the F-New Construction Works: The date of termination of the construction project on January 28, 2015: The amount as agreed upon on March 10, 2015: 560,000 won: the average unit price per separate contract of value-added tax: 560,000 won, and the amount as completed portion of all materials other than the payment items: It shall be collected from the Savings Bank before 2015 Gu administration and shall be paid from the Savings Bank, and shall be governed by the regulations of the Payment Bank.

The payment of balance: Special terms and conditions of a special agreement on the construction of reinforced concrete wages, including the cost of steel reinforced concrete, within seven days after the completion of construction of the material. The terms and conditions of the above contract are only applicable to the portion of the wage construction. This contract is based on the contract area unit price of all subcontractors D, and is based on the calculation area of the present drawings.

(655p. 2) The scope of the construction: (i) the removal of materials within 2 days (day) after the completion of the construction work for cleaning the first floor of the installation of a dust-preventive network for the installation of a non-meter installation from the strato the strato to the strato of the floor; (ii) the removal of materials by each floor of the installation of a dust-preventive network for the anti-meter installation; (iii) the removal of materials after the completion of the construction work for the non-meter finishing installation of a facility for the removal of materials; (iv) the removal of materials after the defreshing construction for the definite finish system installation

E. Around that time, the Plaintiff started the instant construction and completed the construction work on March 11, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant construction contract is not only a construction project between the seventh and tenth stories remaining at the time of suspending the instant construction project, but also a new contract concluded between the Plaintiff and the first and sixth stories underground in which the Plaintiff had performed the instant construction project under the previous subcontract, but also had not been fully paid the construction cost from C, with the total construction area of 655 square meters and the construction cost of 560,000 won per square year (excluding value-added tax).

According to the instant construction contract, the Defendant is against the Plaintiff.

arrow