logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.21 2018가단20123
건물명도등 청구의 소
Text

1. Of the 1st floor of the building listed in the attached Table 1 list, the Defendant shall in sequence indicate 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the attached Table 2 list among the 1st floor of the building.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff leased part (a) of the attached Table Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the 1st floor of the building listed in the attached Table No. 1 on July 14, 2009, to the defendant (hereinafter "the real estate in this case"). The plaintiff notified the defendant of the termination and refusal of the lease term on July 18, 2016, when the lease was renewed thereafter, and the plaintiff did not know that the real estate in this case was ordered again on March 23, 2018, and sent a written notification to the defendant, respectively.

According to the above facts, the lease contract for the instant real estate was terminated upon the expiration of the contract term.

As such, the defendant is obligated to order the plaintiff to clarify the real estate of this case.

The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and accepted.

arrow