1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 22,560,00, and KRW 31,180,595 and each of the said money, the Defendant shall start from September 29, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B are those engaged in the installation and repair of freezing equipment in the trade name of “E” and “F,” and the Defendant is the manufacturer of freezing equipment parts.

B. On June 2013, Plaintiff A: (a) requested the Defendant to install cooling equipment installed in a water tank from the water temperature of 15 to 17 degrees east to store fish in the oil tank on a fishing vessel; (b) paid 20,000,000 won to the Defendant; (c) thereafter, Plaintiff A installed one freezing equipment manufactured and supplied by the Defendant on the H’s vessel.

C. On February 2014, Plaintiff B requested the Defendant to install a lurgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

This case’s freezing machine is in a situation where gas leakage occurs due to ruptures on the distilling machine that the Defendant’s supplementary intervenor supplied the parts during operation, and thus, it cannot be used for its current purpose.

E. On July 10, 2017, the Plaintiffs expressed their intent to rescind a contract for the production and supply of the freezing machine of this case (hereinafter “instant contract for the production and supply”) with the Defendant upon the delivery of the briefs as of July 10, 2017, and the said briefs were served on the Defendant on July 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cancellation of the contract, the contract for the manufacture and supply of this case is a contract for the Defendant to manufacture and supply freezing equipment suitable for its use to the Plaintiffs, without any special circumstances during normal use.