1. Defendant A’s KRW 220,000 and its amount per annum from March 22, 2012 to December 23, 2014, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

A. Defendant A’s assertion around 12:00 on March 22, 2012, when Defendant A convened against the construction of the thermal power plant in the office building of the office building of the office building of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the headquarters of the Republic of Korea, with approximately 1,550 military persons among the Guns, left away in the front of the entrance of the office of the office of the office of the office of the headquarters of the South Korea, thereby removing an electronic reduction device attached to the entrance above the entrance of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the headquarters of the authority of the Republic of Korea, and thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 220,000,000,000 from mental damage to the Plaintiff.

B. (1) Determination: According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 5 through 6, the above defendant was liable to pay to the plaintiff 220,000 won and damages for delay since the fact that the above defendant damaged the electronic identification device owned by the plaintiff during the demonstration on March 22, 2012, and that the repair cost of the above electronic identification device was approximately KRW 220,000,000, respectively.

The defendant asserts that it is abuse of the right of action, but it is recognized that the above defendant damaged the property owned by the plaintiff as seen above. The plaintiff's claim for damages against the part is difficult to view that it abused the right of action, and thus, the above defendant's claim against this part is not accepted.

(2) Mental damage portion: Property damage caused by property damage is serious to the extent that the compensation for the property damage cannot be compensated by itself, unless there are special circumstances.