logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.09.23 2016고단4015
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants established (State) E on May 2012 for the purpose of selling original frying business, and Defendant B established (State)F on November 2012 to leave the director of the said corporation, and Defendant A commenced business with the representative director of the said corporation. However, Defendant B had no other property at the time of bad credit standing, and Defendant A had a duty of KRW 20,000,000,000 to raise business funds without any special property. Defendant A also tried to sell the original frying to the victim G for the purpose of raising business funds in the state of bad credit worth KRW 17,00,000,000,000 without any special property. Since the original frying and selling the original frying, Defendant B may possess the original frying market instead of the original frying and selling the original frying.

It is intended to use land as a security for the above business for a period of one year on the face of the land, and to restore the land to the original state or purchase it after one year, and distribute interest and business profits in return for the provision of collateral so that it can be easily sent to women.

“Along with the intention to make a false statement, the land owned by the victim was provided as security.”

1. On April 26, 2012, the Defendants found the Defendants at the office operated by the injured party on the second floor of the building of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H on April 26, 2012, and made a false statement to the victim as above.

However, even if the Defendants had no property and worked together with the bad credit holders, the Defendants could not restore the said land to its original state by cancelling the security established on the said land after one year, even if they were provided with the land from the injured party as security, and the said profit could not have been reduced.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the victim as above and let the victim do so on the same day, and caused the victim to do so, L, which is the creditor of the Defendants, as the creditor of the Defendants, to have the victim of the land of 14m2, 14m2, 1,768m2, and 280m2, which is owned by the Defendants. The maximum amount of the bonds is six.

arrow